18:33 Al-Kahf (The Cave)

تفسير الآيتين 32 و 33 :ـ يقول تعالى لنبيه صلى الله عليه وسلم: اضرب للناس مثل هذين الرجلين، الشاكر لنعمة الله، والكافر لها، وما صدر من كل منهما، من الأقوال والأفعال، وما حصل بسبب ذلك من العقاب العاجل والآجل، والثواب، ليعتبروا بحالهما، ويتعظوا بما حصل عليهما، وليس معرفة أعيان الرجلين، وفي أي: زمان أو مكان هما فيه فائدة أو نتيجة، فالنتيجة تحصل من قصتهما فقط، والتعرض لما سوى ذلك من التكلف. فأحد هذين الرجلين الكافر لنعمة الله الجليلة، جعل الله له جنتين، أي: بستانين حسنين، من أعناب. { وَحَفَفْنَاهُمَا بِنَخْلٍ } أي: في هاتين الجنتين من كل الثمرات، وخصوصا أشرف الأشجار، العنب والنخل، فالعنب في وسطها، والنخل قد حف بذلك، ودار به، فحصل فيه من حسن المنظر وبهائه، وبروز الشجر والنخل للشمس والرياح، التي تكمل بها الثمار، وتنضج وتتجوهر، ومع ذلك جعل بين تلك الأشجار زرعا، فلم يبق عليهما إلا أن يقال: كيف ثمار هاتين الجنتين؟ وهل لهما ماء يكفيهما؟ فأخبر تعالى أن كلا من الجنتين آتت أكلها، أي: ثمرها وزرعها ضعفين، أي: متضاعفا { و } أنها { لم تَظْلِمْ مِنْهُ شَيْئًا } أي: لم تنقص من أكلها أدنى شيء، ومع ذلك، فالأنهار في جوانبهما سارحة، كثيرة غزيرة. { وَكَانَ لَهُ } أي: لذلك الرجل { ثَمَرٌ } أي: عظيم كما يفيده التنكير، أي: قد استكملت جنتاه ثمارهما، وارجحنت أشجارهما، ولم تعرض لهما آفة أو نقص، فهذا غاية منتهى زينة الدنيا في الحرث، ولهذا اغتر هذا الرجل بهما، وتبجح وافتخر، ونسي آخرته.

ولهذا قال: " كلتا الجنتين آتت أكلها " أي أخرجت ثمرها " ولم تظلم منه شيئًا " أي ولم تنقص منه شيئًا " وفجرنا خلالهما نهرًا " أي والأنهار متفرقة فيهما ههنا وهنها.

The Example of the Rich Idolators and the Poor Muslims

After mentioning the idolators who were too arrogant to sit with the poor and weak among Muslims, showing off before them with their wealth and noble lineage, Allah then gives a parable for them of two men, one of whom Allah gave two gardens of grapes, surrounded with palm trees and cultivated with crops throughout. All of the trees and plants were abundantly fruitful, providing readily accessible, good quality produce. Allah says:

كِلْتَا الْجَنَّتَيْنِ آتَتْ أُكُلَهَا

(Each of those two gardens brought forth its produce,) meaning, produced its fruits,

وَلَمْ تَظْلِمِ مِّنْهُ شَيْئًا

(and failed not in the least therein,) meaning, nothing at all was diminishing.

وَفَجَّرْنَا خِلَـلَهُمَا نَهَراً

(and We caused a river to gush forth in the midst of both.) means, rivers were flowing through them here and there.

وَكَانَ لَهُ ثَمَرٌ

(And he had Thamar,) It was said that what was meant here was wealth, and it was said that what was meant were fruits, which is the more apparent meaning here. This is also supported by the alternative recitation, Thumr, which is the plural of Thamrah (fruit) just as Khushb is the plural of Khashab (wood). Others recite it as Thamar.

فَقَالَ

(and he said) the owner of the two gardens

لَصَـحِبِهِ وَهُوَ يُحَاوِرُهُ

(to his companion in the course of discussion) means, while he was disputing with him and boasting to him and showing off,

أَنَاْ أَكْثَرُ مِنكَ مَالاً وَأَعَزُّ نَفَراً

(I am greater than you in wealth and have a mightier entourage.) meaning, `I have more servants, attendants and children.' Qatadah said, "This, by Allah, is the wish of the immoral to have a lot of wealth and a large entourage. R

وَدَخَلَ جَنَّتَهُ وَهُوَ ظَالِمٌ لِّنَفْسِهِ

(And he went into his garden having been unjust to himself.) meaning, in his disbelief, rebellion, arrogance and denial of the Hereafter.

قَالَ مَآ أَظُنُّ أَن تَبِيدَ هَـذِهِ أَبَداً

(He said: "I do not think this will ever perish.") Thus he was allowing himself to be deceived because of the plants, fruits and trees that he saw, and the rivers flowing through the different parts of his gardens. He thought that it could never come to an end or cease or be destroyed. This was because of his lack of understanding and the weakness of his faith in Allah, and because he was enamored with this world and its adornments, and because he disbelieved in the Hereafter. So he said:

وَمَآ أَظُنُّ السَّاعَةَ قَائِمَةً

("And I do not think the Hour will ever come...") meaning, will ever happen

وَلَئِن رُّدِدتُّ إِلَى رَبِّى لأَجِدَنَّ خَيْراً مِّنْهَا مُنْقَلَباً

(and if indeed I am brought back to my Lord, I surely shall find better than this when I return to Him.) meaning, `if there is a Hereafter and a return to Allah, then I will have a better share than this with my Lord, for if it were not that I am dear to Him, He would not have given me all this.' As Allah says elsewhere:

وَلَئِن رُّجِّعْتُ إِلَى رَبِّى إِنَّ لِى عِندَهُ لَلْحُسْنَى

(But if I am brought back to my Lord, surely there will be for me the best with Him.) 41:50

أَفَرَأَيْتَ الَّذِى كَفَرَ بِـَايَـتِنَا وَقَالَ لأوتَيَنَّ مَالاً وَوَلَداً

(Have you seen him who disbelieved in Our Ayat and said: "I shall certainly be given wealth and children if I will be alive again).")19:77 He took it for granted that Allah would give him this, without any sound evidence for that. The reason why this Ayah was revea- led was because of Al-`As bin Wa'il, as we will explain in the appropriate place, if Allah wills. In Allah we put our trust.

Each of the two gardens kiltā ‘each of the two’ is a singular noun that indicates a dual number; and the entire clause is the subject yielded ātat is the predicate thereof its produce its fruit without stinting diminishing anything thereof. And We caused a stream to gush forth therein to run through them.

At this point, someone may doubt that this advice was reasonably practicable. A separate gathering for them would have not hurt. In fact, it would have made it easier to convey the message of Islam to them and equally easier for them to accept it. But, the creation of such a division would have amounted to seating the rebellious rich on a pedestal of honor, an action that could have broken the hearts of poor Muslims or dampened their courage. Allah Ta` ala, in His ultimate wisdom, would not put up with anything like this. Instead of that, the ground rule of Da'wah and Tabligh given by Him was that there should be no discrimination or distinction against or for anyone in it. Allah knows best.

Ornaments for the People of Jannah

It has been mentioned in verse 31: يُحَلَّوْنَ فِيهَا (They will be adorned therein) that men inmates of Jannah will also be adorned with bracelets of gold. The question it may bring up is that wearing ornaments is neither becoming for men, nor can these be called beauty and embellishment in any relative sense. If bracelets were put on them in Jannah, may be they make them look awful.

The answer is that embellishment and beauty are subservient to practice or custom as recognized in a society. What is considered to be embellishment and beauty in one country or region could more than often be detested in other countries and regions. And this could be the other way round as well. Similarly, something is taken to be an embellishment in a given period of time. Comes another time and it becomes a blemish. When ornaments and silk dresses will come to be established as embellishment and beauty for men of Jannah too, no one is going to feel strange with it there. That which puts restraints on us here is a law of this world which stipulates that it is not permissible for men to wear any ornament of gold, even a ring or chain for watch made of gold. Similarly, silk clothes are not permissible for men. This will not be the law of Jannah. That is a universe of existence separate from this entire universe of our experience. It cannot be imagined on the analogy of anything in and around us on this basis alone.